“Reader, Take Notice”: Aphra Behn’s References and Self-Representation in the Epistle to the Reader in The Dutch Lover

DOI: https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2023-45.2.08

Abstract

Aphra Behn is generally regarded as the first Englishwoman to have lived by the pen, not an easy feat in the competitive world of the literary world of Restoration London. While her early life remains a mystery, her time in London and her allegiances are very well-documented. Throughout her whole career, she crafted a persona that interacted with her readers and the audience in her paratexts; however, the self she presented in the early stages of her career through the references she made has never been fully considered. Investigating these allusions can help fill in the blanks of what is known about her and revisit older conceptions. This study explores and identifies the references she made and the communicative strategies she used in her epistle to the reader printed with The Dutch Lover (1673) and what they mean in terms of the self she crafted.

Author Biography

Victoria Echegaray Mitar, Universidad de Sevilla
Victoria Echegaray-Mitar is a PhD researcher at the University of Seville (FPI). She is currently working on her dissertation—a critical edition of Susanna Centlivre’s first comedy, The Beau’s Duel (1702)—and is a member of the Restoration Comedy Project at the University of Seville. Her research interests include Restoration literature, women writers, bibliography, and textual criticism.

References

Alonso-Almeida, Francisco and Francisco José Álvarez-Gil. 2021. “Impoliteness in Women’s Specialised Writing in Seventeenth-Century English.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22 (1): 121-52.

Arber, Edward. 1903. The Term Catalogues, 1668-1709 A.D. Vol. 3. Privately printed.

Behn, Aphra. 1673. The Dutch Lover a Comedy Acted at the Dvkes Theatre / Written by Mrs. A. Bhen [Sic]. London: n.p. Early English Books Online. [Accessed June 6, 2019]

—. 1996. “The Dutch Lover.” In The Works of Aphra Behn: The Plays, 1671-1677, 5:157-239. London: Pickering & Chatto.

Burns, William E. 2008. “Glanvill [Glanville], Joseph (1636-1680), Church of England Clergyman.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. [Accessed March 4, 2022].

Cottegnies, Line. 2004. “Aphra Behn’s French Translations.” In Hughes and Todd 2004, 221-34.

Doody, Margaret A. 1998. “Gender, Literature, and Gendering Literature in the Restoration.” In Zwicker 1998, 58-81.

Echegaray-Mitar, Victoria. 2022. “From Margaret Cavendish to Susanna Centlivre: The Self-Fashioning of Restoration Women Playwrights.” In Anejos de Diablotexto Digital 9: 12-33.

Finke, Laurie. 1993. “Aphra Behn and the Ideological Construction of Restoration Literary Theory.” In Hutner 1993, 17-43.

Fitzmaurice, James. 1990. “Fancy and the Family: Self-Characterizations of Margaret Cavendish.” Huntington Library Quarterly 53 (3): 199-209.

Gallagher, Catherine. 1994. Nobody’s Story: The Vanishing Acts of Women Writers in the Marketplace 1670-1820. Berkeley: California UP.

Goreau, Angeline. 1985. The Whole Duty of a Woman: Female Writers in Seventeenth Century England. Garden City: Dial Press.

Greenblatt, Stephen. 1983. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: Chicago UP.

Griggs, Burke. 2004. “South, Robert (1634-1716), Church of England Clergyman and Theologian.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. [Accessed March 8, 2022]

Hughes, Derek. 2000. “The Masked Woman Revealed; or, the Prostitute and the Playwright in Aphra Behn Criticism.” Women’s Writing 7 (2): 149-64.

— and Janet Todd, eds. 2004. The Cambridge Companion to Aphra Behn. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Hunter, Michael. 1981. Science and Society in Restoration England. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Hutner, Heidi, ed. 1993. Rereading Aphra Behn: History, Theory, and Criticism. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia.

Kramer, Roberta. 1986. “John Eachard’s ‘The Grounds & Occasions of the Contempt of the Clergy and Religion Enquired in a Letter Written to R. L.’” PhD diss., City University of New York.

Leitch, Vincent B., William E. Cain, Laurie Finke, Barbara Johnson, John McGowan and Jeffrey J. Williams, eds. 2001. The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism. 1st ed. New York: W. W. Norton.

Munns, Jessica. 1993. “‘Good, Sweet, Honey, Sugar-Candied Reader’: Aphra Behn’s Foreplay in Forewords.” In Hutner 1993, 44-62.

Nate, Richard. 2015. “Rhetoric in the Early Royal Society.” In Skouen and Stark 2015, 77-93.

O’Donnell, Mary Ann. 1989. “Aphra Behn: Tory Wit and Unconventional Woman.” In Wilson and Warnke 1989, 341-74.

—. 2004. “Aphra Behn: The Documentary Record.” In Hughes and Todd 2004, 1-11. Parkin, Jon. 2004. “Parker, Samuel (1640-1688), Bishop of Oxford.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. [Accessed March 8, 2022].

Payne, Deborah C. 1991. “The Restoration Dramatic Dedication as Symbolic Capital.” Studies in Eighteenth Century Culture 20 (1): 27-42.

Pearson, David. 2012. “The English Private Library in the Seventeenth Century.” The Library 13 (4): 379-99.

Pender, Patricia. 2013. Early Modern Women’s Writing and the Rhetoric of Modesty. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Reid, Jasper. 2012. Introduction to The Metaphysics of Henry More, 1-34. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Roberts, Sasha. 2007. “Women’s Literary Capital in Early Modern England: Formal Composition and Rhetorical Display in Manuscript and Print.” Women’s Writing 14 (2): 246-69.

Runge, Laura L. 1997. Gender and Language in British Literary Criticism, 1660-1790. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Salzman, Paul. 2006. Reading Early Modern Women’s Writing. Oxford: Oxford UP.

Skouen, Tina and Ryan J. Stark, eds. 2015. Rhetoric and the Early Royal Society. Leiden: Brill.

— and Ryan J. Stark. 2015. Introduction to Rhetoric and the Early Royal Society, edited by Tina Skouen and Ryan J Stark. Leiden: Brill.

Smith, John Harrington. 1948. The Gay Couple in Restoration Comedy. New York: Octagon Books.

Sprat, Thomas. 1667. The History of the Royal-Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. London: T. R. and J. Allestry. Early English Books Online.

Staves, Susan. 2004. “Behn, Women, and Society.” In Hughes and Todd 2004, 12-28.

Teague, Frances. 2004. “Makin [Née Reginald], Bathsua (b. 1600, d. in or after 1675), Scholar and Teacher.” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. [Accessed March 4, 2022].

Todd, Janet. 1996. Introduction to Aphra Behn Studies, edited by Janet Todd, 1-12. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Van Lennep, William, ed. 1965. The London Stage, 1660-1800. Vol. 1. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.

Wilkins, John. 1640. A Discourse Concerning a New World & Another Planet in 2 Bookes. London: John Norton and R. Hearne. Early English Books Online.

Williams, Carolyn D. 2003. “‘This Play Will Be Mine A[rse]’: Aphra Behn’s Jonsonian Negotiations.” In Woolland 2003, 93-106.

Wilson, Katharina M. and Frank J. Warnke, eds. 1989. Women Writers of the Seventeenth Century. Athens: U of Georgia P.

Woolland, Brian, ed. 2003. Jonsonians: Living Traditions. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Zwicker, Stephen N., ed. 1998. The Cambridge Companion to English Literature: 1650-1740. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Published
2023-12-27
Issue
2023: Vol. 45, Num.2
Section
Articles

The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.

Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.

Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.

Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:

  • That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
  • That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.

Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.

Funding data