“He Is Not English, He Is Not a Novelist; And How Far Is He Even Likeable?” On the Critical Reception of Arthur Koestler’s Thieves in the Night
AbstractThis paper deals with the immediate critical reception of Arthur Koestler’s Thieves in the Night (1946). Through a comparative analysis of reviews published at the time of the book’s appearance, it aims to show that the said reception was in many cases neither fair, nor focused on the book’s literary values. More specifically, in comparing the novel’s American reception with its British counterpart, and focusing on the various fallacies and biases, predominantly in the latter, this work aims to draw attention to the fact that the present-day obscurity of this commercially successful novel might be due, at least partially, to the often angered and biased reaction to the topic of the book, and its explicit criticism of British foreign policy, rather than a result of the book’s qualities themselves.Keywords: Arthur Koestler; reception; foreign policy; Palestine; 1946
Anderson, Benedict. (1983) 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Avishai, Bernard. 1990. “Koestler and the Zionist Revolution.” Salmagundi 87: 234-259.
Booth, Wayne C. (1974) 2004. “Types of Narration.” In Narrative Theory: Critical Concepts in Literary and Cultural Theories. Vol. 1, edited by Mieke Bal. New York: Routledge.
Bowen, Elizabeth. 1946. “Books Reviewed.” Tatler, December 4.
Buckard, Christian. 2004. Arthur Koestler: Ein extremes Leben 1905-1983. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Cesarani, David. 1998. Arthur Koestler: The Homeless Mind. London: William Heinemann.
Colacurcio, Michael J. 1972. “Footsteps of Ann Hutchinson: The Context of the Scarlet Letter.” ELH 39 (3): 459-494.
Conner, John. 1947. “Thieves in the Night.” Leatherneck 30 (4): 59.
Crossman, R.H.S. 1946. “The Anatomy of Terrorism.” The New Statesman and Nation, November 2: 321-322.
D’Amico, Jack. 1992. “Shakespeare’s Rome: Politics and Theater.” Modern Language Studies 22 (1): 65-78.
Dennen, Leon. 1946. “Self-Hate as Patriotism: THIEVES IN THE NIGHT. By Arthur Koestler. The Macmillan Co. New York. 1946. 357 pages.” The New Leader 29 (19): 12.
DuBois, William E.B. 1926. “Criteria of Negro Art.” The Crisis, October. [Accessed online on March 31, 2016].
Fitzsimons, M. A. 1947. “Reviews.” The Review of Politics, January 1, 109-110.
Fremantle, Anne. 1947. “What Comes Naturally.” The Commonweal, February 28, 493-494.
Fyvel, T. R. 1946. “To the King David Hotel.” Tribune, October 25, 14-15.
Glazer, Nathan. 1947. “The Parlor Terrorists: Koestler’s Fellow Travelers and their Politics.” Commentary, January 1, 55-58.
Hamilton, Iain. 1982. Koestler: A Biography. London: Secker & Warburg.
Hilbrook, Roy. 1946. “Thieves in the Night.” Current History, December, 512.
Holme, Christopher. 1946. “Zion.” The Observer, November 3, 3.
J. M. D. P. 1946. “Mr. Koestler.” The Manchester Guardian, October 25, 3.
Kearney, Richard. 2003. Strangers, Gods and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness. New York: Routledge.
Kochavi, Arieh J. 1998. “The Struggle against Jewish Immigration to Palestine.” Middle Eastern Studies 34 (3): 146-167.
Koestler, Arthur. 1940. Darkness at Noon. London: Macmillan.
—. 1943. Arrival and Departure. London: Jonathan Cape.
—. (1946) 1949. Thieves in the Night: Chronicle of an Experiment. London: Macmillan.
—. 1951. The Age of Longing. New York: Macmillan.
—. 1967. The Ghost in the Machine. London: Hutchinson.
Levene, Mark. 1984. Arthur Koestler. New York: Frederick Ungar.
Lotman, Jurij. (1966) 1988. “Problems in the Typology of Texts.” In Soviet Semiotics: An Anthology, edited and translated by Daniel P. Lucid. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. 119-124.
Lowett, Robert. 1947. “Thieves in the Night by Arthur Koestler.” The Humanist 7, 152.
MacDonagh, Donagh. 1946. “Evolution of a Terrorist.” The Irish Times, November 23, 6.
MacLean, Sally-Beth. 1993. “The Politics of Patronage: Dramatic Records in Robert Dudley’s Household Books.” Shakespeare Quarterly 44 (2): 175-182.
Márton, László. 2006. Koestler, a lázadó. Budapest: Pallas.
—. 2012. Koestler asszonyai. Budapest: Noran Libro.
Mortimer, Raymond. 1946. “Arthur Koestler.” The Atlantic Monthly, November, 132-136.
Murray, Timothy. 1983. “Theatrical Legitimation: Forms of French Patronage and Portraiture.” PMLA 98 (2): 170-182.
Parry, John J. 1952. “The Court Poets of the Welsh Princes.” PMLA 67 (4): 511-520.
Posner, Richard A. 1997. “Against Ethical Criticism.” Philosophy and Literature 21: 1-27.
Prinz, Elisabeth. 2010. Im Körper des Souveräns: Politische Krankheitsmetaphern bei Arthur Koestler. Vienna: Braumüller.
Pritchett, V. S. 1948. “Koestler: A Guilty Figure.” Harper’s Magazine 196 (1172): 84-92.
Quenell, Peter. 1946. “If You Kick This Book Across The Room—You Will Probably Read It Later.” Daily Mail, November 2.
Scammell, Michael. 2010. Koestler: The Indispensable Intellectual. London: Faber and Faber.
Stone, Isidor Feinstein. 1946. Underground to Palestine. New York: Boni & Gaer.
Szívós, Mihály. 2006. Koestler Arthur: Tanulmányok és esszék. Budapest: Typotex.
The Koestler Archive. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Library, Centre for Research Collections.
Wainwright, Martin. 1983. “Koestler and Wife Found Dead.” The Guardian, March 4.
Weigel, Robert G., ed. 2009. Arthur Koestler: Ein heller Geinst in dunkler Zeit. Tübingen: Francke.
Wellek, René and Austin Warren. 1949. Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Weßel, Matthias. 2015. “‘Becoming Anglicized?’ The Increasing Importance of English Characters in the Exile Novels of Arthur Koestler and Robert Neumann.” Moravian Journal of Literature and Film 5 (1): 1-11.
White, Osmar. 1947. “US Sailor Looks In.” Herald (Melbourne), February 15.
Womersley, David. 1989. “The Politics of Shakespeare’s King John.” The Review of English Studies 40 (160): 497-515.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.