On the Use of make to vs. make ø in Early English Medical Writing
AbstractObject infinitive constructions are the most frequent type of non-finite complement clauses, in which the object infinitive may occur either marked (a to-infinitive) or unmarked (a bare infinitive). From a historical viewpoint, the bare infinitive is the preferred form in Old English, the number of examples being comparatively small however. This picture changed in Middle English and especially in early Modern English, when the to-infinitive begins to outnumber the bare infinitive in this kind of clause. The verb make, among others, is considered to be an exception to this, as it is observed to accept both variants from Middle English, even though it later progressed towards the final adoption of the bare construction in Present-Day English. Fischer associates this development of make with the introduction of the verb cause into English, which took over the indirect causation formerly expressed by the verb make, the latter “slowly finding itself restricted to the bare infinitive, expressing only direct causation” (1997, 127). The present paper investigates the construction make to vs. make ø in late Middle English and early Modern English medical writing with the following objectives: (a) to analyse the distribution of the marked and the unmarked infinitive with this verb in the period 1350-1700; (b) to classify the phenomenon according to different text types; and (c) to evaluate the contribution of the following factors in the choice of one particular infinitival form: (i) the presence of intervening elements between the verb and the object infinitive; (ii) the size of the object phrase; and (iii) the morphology of the matrix verb. The data used as source of evidence come from the Corpus of Early English Medical Writing. Keywords: bare infinitive; early English medical writing; make; object infinitive constructions; to-infinitive
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.