Encountering the Posthuman Animal: Revisiting Dian Fossey’s Gorillas in the Mist
AbstractPosthumanist theory has rendered possible the rereading of texts that have until now been subjected to more traditional humanist critiques. By opening new exegetical dimensions through which to approach the literary artifact, we can not only challenge speciesist assumptions but also revisit the implications of both literary conventions and literary theory. The aim of this paper is to present an alternative, posthumanist interpretation of Dian Fossey’s Gorillas in the Mist (1983) so as to analyze the manner by which the de-voiced nonhuman others are rendered as full biographical subjects that rise above the humanist emphasis on speech and reason. I begin with a critical overview of the posthumanist challenge and of the dialectical resistance imposed by humanist ideology. I then turn to an in-depth analysis of Gorillas in the Mist as an example of literary defiance of humanism. Through a series of rhetorical strategies, Fossey finds a way through which to speak the gorillas, at the same time as she relocates her own condition as a human within a space where a new form of encountering the other is possible.Keywords: posthumanism; Dian Fossey; primatology; (auto)biography; (animal) consciousness
Adams, Carol J. 1990. The Sexual Politics of Meat. New York: Continuum.
Aristotle. (335-323 BCE) 1996. “From the Politics.” Translated by H. Rackham. In A Textual Introduction to Social and Political Theory, edited by Richard Bellamy and Angus Ross, 47-55. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP.
Cavalieri, Paola. 2015. “The Meaning of the Great Ape Project.” Politics and Animals 1: 16-34.
Cavalieri, Paola and Peter Singer, eds. 1993. The Great Ape Project: Equality Beyond Humanity. London: Fourth Estate.
Chambers, Samuel A. 2013. The Lessons of Rancière. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP.
Cherry, Elizabeth. 2010. “Shifting Symbolic Boundaries: Cultural Strategies of the Animal Rights Movement.” Sociological Forum 25 (3): 450-475.
De Waal, Frans. 2006. Primates and Philosophers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.
DeGrazia, David. 2002. Animal Rights. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP.
Derrida, Jacques. (2006) 2008. The Animal that Therefore I Am. Translated by David Willis and edited by Marie-Louise Mallet. New York: Fordham UP.
Fossey, Dian. (1983) 1985. Gorillas in the Mist. London: Phoenix.
Gaard, Greta, ed. 1993. Ecofeminism. Women, Animals, Nature. Philadelphia: Temple UP.
Gaarder, Emily. 2011. Women and the Animal Rights Movement. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP.
Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.
—. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis and London: U of Minnesota P.
Hausfater, Glenn and Kenneth A. R. Kennedy. 1986. “Dian Fossey,1932-1985.” American Anthropologist 88 (4): 953-956.
Iveson, Richard. 2011. “Philosophers and their Animals—Between Derrida and
Rancière.” Zoogenesis. [Accessed online on October 17, 2016].
Jahme, Carole. 2000. Beauty and the Beasts. Woman, Ape and Evolution. New York: Soho.
Jones, Pattrice. 2004. “Mothers with Monkeywrenches: Feminist Imperatives and the ALF.” In Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals, edited by Stephen Best and Anthony J. Nocella II, 137-156. New York: Lantern Books.
King, Barbara J. 1991. “Is Fieldwork Feminine?” [Review of Walking with the Great Apes: Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey and Biruté Galdikas, by Sy Montgomery]. The Women’s Review of Books 9 (8): 19-20.
Lacan, Jacques. (1956) 1999. “Fonction et Champ de la Parole et du Langage en Psychanalyse.” In Écrits, 235-321. Paris: Seuil.
Lejeune, Phillipe. 1989. “The Autobiographical Pact.” Translated by Katherine Leary. In On Autobiography, edited by Paul John Eakin, 3-30. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
Montgomery, Sy. (1991) 2009. Walking with the Great Apes: Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey and Biruté Galdikas. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
Morell, Virginia. 1993. “Called ‘Trimates,’ Three Bold Women Shaped their Field.” Science 260: 420-425.
Morris, Marla. 2015. “Posthuman Education and Animal Interiority.” In Posthumanism and Educational Research, edited by Nathan Snaza and John A. Weaver, 43-55. New York: Routledge.
Oliver, Kelly. 2009. Animal Lessons. New York: Columbia UP.
Olney, James. 1998. Memory and Narrative. The Weave of Life-writing. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
Rancière, Jacques. 1992. “Politics, Identification, and Subjectivization.” October 61: 58-64.
—. (1992) 1995. On the Shore of Politics. Translated by Liz Heron. London and New York: Verso.
—. (1995) 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Translated by Julie Rose. Minneapolis and London: U of Minnesota P.
Rancière, Jacques and David Panagia. 2000. “Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière.” Diacritics 30 (2): 113-126.
Rees, Amanda. 2007. “A Reflection on the Field: Primatology, Popular Science and the Politics of Personhood.” Social Studies of Science 37 (6): 881-907.
Rollin, Bernard. 1998. “On Telos and Genetic Engineering.” In Animal Biotechnology and Ethics, edited by Alan Holland and Andrew Johnson, 156-171. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Smith, Sidonie and Julia Watson. 2010. Reading Autobiography. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: U Minnesota P.
Warren, Karen J. 2000. Ecofeminist Philosophy. Lanham and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Watson, Martha. 1999. Lives of their Own: Rhetorical Dimensions in Autobiographies of Women Activists. Columbia: U of South Carolina P.
Wolfe, Cary. 2003. Animal Rites. Chicago and London: U of Chicago P.
—. 2010. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis and London: U of Minnesota P.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.