Eliecer Crespo-Fernández. 2015. Sex in Language. Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums.

  • Andrea Pizarro Pedraza Université catholique de Louvain



Author Biography

Andrea Pizarro Pedraza, Université catholique de Louvain
Andrea Pizarro Pedraza holds a post-doctoral scholarship (Move-In) at the Université catholique de Louvain (Belgium). Her area of expertise is the linguistic expression of sexual taboo in Spanish and, more broadly, the interpretation of meaning variation in speech and social networks. She has authored papers on the variation of sexual concepts and has collected the Madrilenian Spoken Corpus of Sexuality (MadSex).


Allan, Keith and Kate Burridge. 2006. Forbidden words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP.

Cameron, Deborah and Don Kulick. 2006. “Heteronorms.” In The Language and Sexuality Reader, edited by Deborah Cameron and Don Kulick, 165-168. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

Carston, Roby. 1997. “Enrichment and loosening: complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed?” Linguistische Berichte 8: 103-127.

Casas Gómez, Miguel. 2009. “Towards a New Approach to the Linguistic Definition of Euphemism.” Language Sciences 31 (6): 725-739.

—. 2012. “The expressive creativity of euphemism and dysphemism.” Lexis: E-Journal in English Lexicology 7: 43-64.

Chamizo Domínguez, Pedro J. 1998. Metáfora y conocimiento. Málaga: Analecta Malacitana / U. de Málaga.

—. 2004. “La función social y cognitiva del eufemismo y del disfemismo.” Panace@: Revista de Medicina, Lenguaje y Traducción 5 (15): 45-51.

Coates, Jennifer. 2013. “The discursive production of everyday heterosexualities.” Discourse and Society 24 (5): 536-552.

Crespo Fernández, Eliecer. 2008. “Sex-related Euphemism and Dysphemism: An analysis in Terms of Conceptual Metaphor.” Atlantis. Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies 30 (2): 95-110.

Deignan, Alice. 2010. “The evaluative properties of metaphors.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, edited by Graham Low et al., 357-374. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Grondelaers, Stefan and Dirk Geeraerts. 1998. “Vagueness as a euphemistic strategy.” In Speaking of Emotions: Conceptualisation and Expression, edited by Angeliki Athanasiadou and Elzbieta Tabakowska, 357-374. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Koller, Veronika. 2004. Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse. A Critical Cognitive Study. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kövecses, Zoltan. 2005. Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

—. 2010. “Metaphor and Culture.” Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Phiolologica, 2 (2): 197-220.

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: U of Chicago P.

Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea. 2013. “Tabú y eufemismo en la ciudad de Madrid. Estudio sociolingüístico-cognitivo de los conceptos sexuales.” PhD diss., U Complutense of Madrid.

—. 2015. “Who Said Abortion? Semantic Variation and Ideology in Spanish Newspapers’ Online Discussions.” Australian Journal of Linguistics, 35 (1): 53-75.

Shariffian, Farzad. 2011. Cultural Conceptualizations and Language. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Steen, Gerard J. 2011. “The contemporary theory of metaphor: Now new and improved.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26-64.

Velasco Sacristán, María Sol. 2005. “A critical cognitive-pragmatic approach to advertising gender metaphors.” Intercultural Pragmatics 2 (3): 219-252.