Emotional Rhetoric in Tea Advertising
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2021-43.1.11Abstract
Drawing on rhetorical and pragmatic (Relevance Theory) approaches to emotions, this article examines claims of cultural and patriotic identity in British tea websites as examples of emotional rhetoric. I hypothesise that such claims operate as persuasive strategies designed to elicit empathy towards the product in potential consumers and ultimately to persuade them to identify with it. Results indicate that cultural identity in the form of patriotism, understood as social identity, collective memory and a feeling of belonging to or pride in one’s country, can fulfil a threefold creative effect: at a rhetorical level, it contributes to the design of a stylistically pleasing text; at an informative level, it introduces an unexpected or foreign element into the advertisement; and at a pragmatic level, it involves potential addressees in the recovery of a message that can be tailored to suit their specific individual experiences.
Downloads
References
AJTONY, Zsuzsanna. 2013. “Various Facets of the English Stereotype in Downton Abbey: A Pragmatic Approach.” Topics in Linguistics 12 (1): 5-14.
ANTHONY, Laurence. 2019. AntConc Software (3.5.8). Accessed November 17, 2019.
ARIELY, Gal. 2017. “Why does Patriotism Prevail? Contextual Explanations of Patriotism across Countries.” Identities 24 (3): 351-77.
ARNOULD, Eric and Craig Thompson. 2005. “Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research.” Journal of Consumer Research 31 (4): 868-82.
AVERILL, James. 2001. “The Rhetoric of Emotion, with a Note on What Makes Great Literature Great.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 19 (1): 5-26.
BARBALET, Jack. 1992. “A Macro Sociology of Emotion: Class Resentment.” Sociological Theory 10 (2): 150-63.
BOWKER, Lynne and Jennifer Pearson. 2002. Working with Specialised Language: A Practical Guide to Using Corpora. London and New York: Routledge.
BRYANT, Christopher. 2003. “These Englands, or Where does Devolution Leave the English?” Nations and Nationalism 9 (3): 393-412.
CARSTON, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
—. 2018. “Figurative Language, Mental Imagery, and Pragmatics.” Metaphor and Symbol 33 (3): 198-217.
CAVE, Terence and Deirdre Wilson, eds. 2018. Reading beyond the Code. Oxford: Oxford UP.
CLARK, Bill. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
COCA-STEFANIAK, Andrea, Cathy Parker and Patricia Rees. 2010. “Localisation as a Marketing Strategy of Small Retailers.” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 38 (9): 677-97.
DE CILLIA, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak. 1999. “The Discursive Construction of National Identities.” Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149-73.
DE SAUSSURE, Louis and Tim Wharton. 2019. “La notion de pertinence au défi des effets émotionnels.” TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage 35: 1-24.
DEL SAZ-RUBIO, Milagros. 2018. “Female Identities in TV Toiletries Ads: A Pragmatic and Multimodal Analysis of Implied Meanings.” Journal of Pragmatics 136: 54-78.
ELLIOTT, Richard and Kritsadarat Wattanasuwan. 1998. “Brands as Symbolic Resources for the Construction of Identity.” International Journal of Advertising 17 (2): 131-44.
ERDOGAN, Zafer. 1999. “Celebrity Endorsement: A Literature Review.” Journal of Marketing Management 15 (4): 291-314.
FARRELL, Mary. 2002. From Cha to Tea: A Study of the Influence of Tea Drinking on British Culture. Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I.
FOX, Kate. 2005. Watching the English: The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
FROMER, Julie. 2008. “‘Deeply Indebted to the Tea-Plant’: Representations of English National Identity in Victorian Histories of Tea.” Victorian Literature and Culture 36 (2): 531-47.
GRIMSON, Alejandro. 2010. “Culture and Identity: Two Different Notions.” Social Identities 16 (1): 61-77.
HELLELAND, Botolv. 2012. “Place Names and Identities.” Oslo Studies in Language 4 (2): 95-116.
HOLTON, Richard. 1958. “The Distinction between Convenience Goods, Shopping Goods and Specialty Goods.” Journal of Marketing 23 (1): 53-56.
IZQUIERDO, Marlén and María Pérez Blanco. 2020. “A Multi-Level Contrastive Analysis of Promotional Strategies in Specialised Discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 58: 43-57.
JANOSCHKA, Anja. 2004. Web Advertising. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
KRESS, Gunther and Theo Van Leeuwen. (1996) 2004. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London and New York: Routledge.
LABRADOR, Belén et al. 2014. “Rhetorical Structure and Persuasive Language in the Subgenre of Online Advertisements.” English for Specific Purposes 34: 38-47.
MARTÍNEZ-CAMINO, Gonzalo and Manuel Pérez-Saiz. 2012. “A Pragmatic Theory on Television Advertising.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (4): 453-73.
MCQUARRIE, Edward and Barbara Philips. 2008a. “Advertising Rhetoric.” In McQuarrie and Philips 2008, 3-19.
—, eds. 2008b. Go Figure! New Directions in Advertising Rhetoric. New York: Sharpe.
ÖSTMAN, Jan-Ola and Jef Verschueren, eds. 2018. Handbook of Pragmatics: 21st Annual Installment. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
RAMÓN, Noelia and Belén Labrador. 2018. “Selling Cheese Online: Key Nouns in Cheese Descriptions.” Terminology 24 (2): 210-33.
RAPP, Christof. 2005. “L’arte di suscitare le emozioni nella retorica di Aristotele.” Acta Philosophica 14 (2): 313-28.
SARDOC, Mitja. 2017. “The Anatomy of Patriotism.” Anthropological Notebooks 23 (1): 43-55.
SIMPSON, Paul. 2001. “‘Reason’ and ‘Tickle’ as Pragmatic Constructs in the Discourse of Advertising.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (4): 589-607.
SKEY, Michael. 2011. National Belonging and Everyday Life: The Significance of Nationhood in an Uncertain World. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Kindle edition.
SPERBER, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
—. 2015. “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (44): 117-49.
STATISTA: GLOBAL PER CAPITA TEA CONSUMPTION. Accessed February 7, 2020.
STREY, Claudia. 2018. “Emotions: A Philosophical and Cognitive Perspective.” In Östman and erschueren 2018, 111-23.
WEIGHT, Richard. 2002. Patriots: National Identity in Britain 1940-2000. London: Pan Books. Kindle edition.
WILSON, Deirdre. 2018. “Relevance Theory and Literary Interpretation.” In Cave and Wilson 2018, 185-204.
WILSON, Deirdre and Robyn Carston. 2019. “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-Propositional’ Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31-38.
WORLD TEA DIRECTORY. Accessed March 8, 2019.
YUS, Francisco. 2016. “Propositional Attitude, Affective Attitude and Irony Comprehension.” Pragmatics & Cognition 23 (1): 92-116.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
