The History of for example and for instance as Markers of Exemplification, Selection and Argumentation (1600-1999)
Abstract
This article analyses the use of the example markers for example and for instance in exemplifying, selective and argumentative constructions. Of these three uses, exemplification—twofold sequences with a first general unit or hyperonym and a second more specific item or hyponym—has received recurrent attention in the literature, whereas selection—constructions where the first element is omitted—and argumentation—the use of example markers to connect whole chunks of discourse—have long been ignored. The present study, using data from ARCHER 3.2, shows that the three uses have coexisted since at least the second half of the seventeenth century and that argumentation prevails in both British and American English. Moreover, example markers are very productive in certain genres, such as science, sermons and advertising. Additionally, even though the primary function of example markers is to introduce their scope domain, they have developed different pragmatic values that bring them closer to the category of discourse markers. Thus, for example, their use as mitigators makes them an optimal tool for smoothing interaction and hence reducing the risk of offending our interlocutor.References
ARPAN, Laura M. 2009. “The Effects of Exemplification on Perceptions of News Credibility.” Mass Communication and Society 12 (3): 249-70.
BAROTTO, Alessandra. 2018. “The Hedging Function of Exemplification: Evidence from Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 123: 24-37.
BIBER, Douglas et al., comps. 2013. A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers (Archer), v. 3.2. Manchester: University of Manchester.
EGGS, Ekkehard and Dermot McElholm. 2013. Exemplifications, Selections and Argumentations: The Use of Example Markers in English and German. Bern: Peter Lang.
ENCYCLOPAEDIA BRITANNICA ONLINE. 2020. s. v. “Feoffment.” [Accessed July 6, 2020].
FERNÁNDEZ-BERNÁRDEZ, Cristina. 1994-1995. “Marcadores textuales de ‘ejemplificación’ textual.” ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística 10: 103-44.
FUSTER-MÁRQUEZ, Miguel, Carmen Gregori-Signes and José Santaemilia Ruiz, eds. 2020. Multiperspectives in Analysis and Corpus Design. Granada: Comares.
GIBSON, Rhonda and Dolf Zillmann. 1994. “Exaggerated versus Representative Exemplification in News Reports: Perception of Issues and Personal Consequences.” Communication Research 21 (5): 603-24.
HITCHCOCK, David. 2002. “The Practice of Argumentative Discussion.” Argumentation 16 (3): 287-98.
HYLAND, Ken. 2007. “Applying a Gloss: Exemplifying and Reformulating in Academic Discourse.” Applied Linguistics 28 (2): 266-85.
JOHNSON, Ralph H. 2000. Manifest Rationality: A Pragmatic Theory of Argument. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
KOKTOVÁ, Eva. 1986. “Apposition as a Pragmatic Phenomenon in a Functional Description.” University of East Anglia Papers in Linguistics 23: 39-79.
LE GOFF, Jacques. 1985. L’Imaginaire médiéval: Éssais. Paris: Gallimard.
LO BAIDO, Maria Cristina. 2018. “Mitigation via Exemplification in Present-day Italian: A Corpus-based Study.” ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística Annex 4: 11-32.
MEUNIER, Fanny and Sylviane Granger, eds. 2008. Phraseology in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
MEYER, Charles F. 1992. Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
PAQUOT, Magali. 2008. “Exemplification in Learner Writing: A Cross-linguistic Perspective.” In Meunier and Granger 2008, 101-19.
PERRY, Stephen D. and William J. Gonzenbach. 1997. “Effects of News Exemplification Extended: Considerations of Controversiality and Perceived Future Opinion.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 41 (2): 229-44.
PROCTER, Paul. (1978) 2009. Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English. 5th ed. Harlow: Longman.
QUIRK, Randolph et al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
RABINOWITZ, Harold and Suzanne Vogel, eds. 2009. The Manual of Scientific Style: A Guide for Authors, Editors, and Researchers. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
RODRÍGUEZ-ABRUÑEIRAS, Paula. 2011. “Apposition vs. Exemplification with including and included as Markers: Same or Different Categories?” In Ruano-García et al. 2011, 121-30.
—. 2012. “From Full Verbal Forms to Markers of Exemplification: including and included as a Case of Grammaticalisation?” In Tizón-Couto et al. 2012, 125-41.
—. 2015. “Exemplifying Markers in English: Synchronic and Diachronic Considerations.” PhD diss., University of Santiago de Compostela.
—. 2020a. “Example Markers at the Intersection of Grammaticalization and Lexicalization.” English Studies 101 (5): 616-39.
—. 2020b. “Two Example Markers in and beyond Exemplification: Dialectal, Register and Pragmatic Considerations in the 21st Century.” In Fuster-Márquez, Gregori-Signes and Santaemilia Ruiz 2020, 33-45.
RUANO-GARCÍA, Javier et al., eds. 2011. Current Trends in Anglophone Studies: Cultural, Linguistic and Literary Research. Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.
SUHR, Carla, Terttu Nevalainen and Irma Taavitsainen, eds. 2019. From Data to Evidence in English Language Research. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
TAAVITSAINEN, Irma. 2011. “Medical Case Reports and Scientific Thought-Styles.” Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17: 75-98.
TAAVITSAINEN, Irma and Gerold Schneider. 2019. “Scholastic Argumentation in Early English Medical Writing and its Afterlife: New Corpus Evidence.” In Suhr, Nevalainen and Taavitsainen 2019, 191-221.
TIZÓN-COUTO, David et al., eds. 2012. New Trends and Methodologies in Applied English Language Research II: Studies in Variation, Meaning and Learning. Bern: Peter Lang.
VAN EEMEREN, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst. 2016. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
WEBBER, Bonnie et al. 2003. “Anaphora and Discourse Structure.” Computational Linguistics 29 (4): 545-87.
YÁÑEZ-BOUZA, Nuria. 2011. “ARCHER: Past and Present (1990-2010).” ICAME Journal 35: 205-36.
ZILLMANN, Dolf. 1999. “Exemplification Theory: Judging the Whole by Some of its Parts.” Journal of Media Psychology 1 (1): 69-94.
ZILLMANN, Dolf and Hans-Bernd Brosius. 2000. Exemplification in Communication: The Influence of Case Reports on the Perception of Issues. London and New York: Routledge.
ZILLMANN, Dolf et al. 1996. “Effects of Exemplification in News Reports on the Perception of Social Issues.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73 (2): 437-44.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
Funding data
-
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Grant numbers FFI2017-82162-P