I Like This Analysis, but I Don’t Think Every Linguist Will: Syntactic NOT-Transportation, VP Ellipsis and VP Pronominalisation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2021-43.2.04Abstract
In this article I consider some recent objections raised against the syntactic treatment of negation in English multiclausal structures, in particular what has been called NEG-raising. I argue that the objections based on pronominalisation and ellipsis presented in the recent literature do pose a problem for syntactic accounts of the mechanisms of so-called NOT-transportation that rely on a rule of leftwards movement, as is customary in generative grammar. However, there is an alternative syntactic treatment that assumes that negation originates as a higher predicate and is subject to a rule of lowering. I show that a syntactic theory of NOT-transportation is tenable and accounts for the problematic data if NEG-raising is replaced, in the analysis of the cases considered here, by a rule of NEG-lowering.
Downloads
References
Akmajian, Adrian and Frank Heny. 1975. An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bach, Emmon and Robert Harms, eds. 1968. Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Binnick, Robert et al., eds. 1969. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: U. of Chicago P.
Carden, Guy. 1967. “Quantifiers as Higher Predicates.” Master’s thesis, Harvard University.
—. 1970. “A Note on Conflicting Idiolects.” Linguistic Inquiry 1 (3): 281-90.
—. 1976. English Quantifiers: Logical Structure and Linguistic Variation. New York: Academic Press.
Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. 1971. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, IL: U. of Chicago P.
Cole, Peter, ed. 1978. Pragmatics. Vol 9, Syntax and Semantics. New York: Academic Press.
Collins, Chris and Paul Postal. 2014. Classical NEG Raising: An Essay on the Syntax of Negation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
—. 2018. “Dispelling the Cloud of Unknowing: More on the Syntactic Nature of Neg Raising.” In Turner and Horn 2018, 54-81.
Crowley, Paul. 2019. “Neg-Raising and Neg Movement.” Natural Language Semantics 27 (1): 1-17.
Epstein, Samuel. 1976. “Investigations in Pragmatic Theory.” PhD diss., University of California.
Fillmore, Charles J. 1963. “The Position of Embedding Transformations in a Grammar.” Word 19 (2): 208-31.
Fodor, Jerry and Jerrold Katz, eds. 1964. The Structure of Language Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gajewski, Jon. 2005. “Neg-Raising: Polarity and Presupposition.” PhD diss., University of Michigan.
Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. “Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure.” Linguistic Inquiry 12 (2): 155-84.
González Rodríguez, Raquel. 2009. La gramática de los términos de polaridad positiva. Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha.
Goodall, Grant. 2009. Parallel Structures in Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Hallman, Peter. 2004. “Constituency and Agency in the VP.” In Schmeiser et al. 2004, 101-14.
Horn, Laurence. 1971. “Negative Transportation: Unsafe at Any Speed?” In Chicago Linguistic Society 1971, 120-33.
—. 1972. “On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English.” PhD diss., University of California.
—. 1978. “Remarks on Neg-Raising.” In Cole 1978, 129-220.
—. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: U. of Chicago P.
—. 2014. Foreword to Classical NEG Raising: An Essay on the Syntax of Negation, by Chris Collins and Paul Postal, i-xvii. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Huang, Cheng-Teh James. 1982. “Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar.” PhD diss., National Taiwan Normal University.
Jacobson, Pauline. 2018. “Some People Think There Is Neg Raising and Some Don’t: Neg Raising Meets Ellipsis.” Linguistic Inquiry 49 (3): 559-76.
—. 2020. “Neg Raising and Ellipsis (and Related Issues) Revisited.” Natural Language Semantics 28: 111-40.
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.
Katz, Jerrold and Paul Postal. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. “Linguistic Universals and Linguistic Change.” In Bach and Harms 1968, 171-202.
Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky. 1971. “Fact.” In Steinberg and Jakovovits 1971, 345-69.
Klima, Edward. 1964. “Negation in English.” In Fodor and Katz 1964, 246-323.
Krivochen, Diego Gabriel. 2019. “On Intensive Endophoric Devices in English.” Studia Anglica Posnaniesia 54 (1): 81-112.
—. 2020. “On NEG Lowering into Quantifiers.” Acta Linguistica Hafniesia 53 (1): 91-125.
Lakoff, Robin. 1969. “A Syntactic Argument for Negative Transportation.” In Binnick et al. 1969, 149-57.
Lechner, Winifred. 1998. “Two Kinds of Reconstruction.” Studia Linguistica 52 (3): 276-310.
McCawley, James. 1973a. “On the Deep Structure of Negative Clauses.” In McCawley 1973b, 277-84.
—, ed. 1973b. Grammar and Meaning. New York: Academic Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Ormazábal, Javier. 2005. “The Syntactic Distribution of Factive Complements.” Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 91-110.
Pullum, Geoffrey and Rodney Huddleston. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Rivero, María Luisa. 1994. “Negation, Imperatives and Wackernagel Effect.” Rivista di Linguistica 6 (1): 91-118.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ross, John Robert. 1967. “Constraints on Variables in Syntax.” PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Schmeiser, Benjamin et al., eds. 2004. Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Steinberg, Danny and Leon Jakovovits, eds. 1971. Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Turner, Ken and Laurence Horn, eds. 2018. Pragmatics, Truth and Underspecification: Towards an Atlas of Meaning. Leiden: Brill.
Uriagereka, Juan. 2002. Derivations: Exploring the Dynamics of Syntax. London and New York: Routledge.
Vicente, Luis. 2010. “On the Syntax of Adversative Coordination.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 381-415.
Williams, Edwin. 1978. “Across-the-Board Rule Application.” Linguistic Inquiry 9 (1): 31-43.
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2018. “Does Neg-Raising Involve Neg-Raising?” Topoi 37 (3): 417-33.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
