Metadiscoursal Realisation of Pragmatic Strategies @ResearchProject Twitter Accounts

Abstract

To ensure the global communication and visibility of their investigations, international research projects leverage online settings and endorse specific digital academic practices. Twitter as a Social Medium for Research Purposes has become an effective outlet to widely disseminate their project development, knowledge production and research findings. To meet these aims, research groups display pragmatic strategies responding to three overarching communicative intentions –informative, interactional and promotional– as well as metadiscursive markers to establish links through their texts with the audience. This paper analyses these practices by looking into the metadiscoursal realisations of a taxonomy of twenty-seven data-driven pragmatic strategies in ten Horizon2020 research project Twitter accounts. First, we revisit metadiscursive adjustments for the digital environment of Twitter. Then, we identify salient metadiscourse features instantatiating the pragmatic strategies using NVivo. In general, interactional metadiscursive features predominate over interactive ones, being attitude markers, self-mentions and directives characteristic markers in informative, promotional and interactional strategies, respectively. Moreover, some metadiscourse categories are found to rely on non-verbal markers for their realisation. The analysis expands the understanding of complex digital discursive practices developed by researchers to disseminate their results, account for their funding, make themselves visible and engage multiple audiences.

Author Biographies

Pilar Mur-Dueñas, Universidad de Zaragoza, IEDIS Research Institute
Pilar Mur-Dueñas is a senior lecturer in the Department of English and German Studies at the Faculty of Education, University of Zaragoza (Spain). She is a member of the InterGedi research group. Her research focuses on the analysis of scholars’ digital practices in scientific communication and dissemination.
Daniel Pascual, Universidad de Zaragoza, IEDIS Research Institute
Daniel Pascual is a Doctor in English Studies at the University of Zaragoza (Spain). His PhD dissertation analysed the pragmatic strategies employed by international research groups to communicate their scientific projects. His research interests comprise pragmatics, digital discourse, multimodality and metadiscourse, especially those aspects concerning digital practices unfolded in websites and social media for knowledge dissemination and researchers’ visibility.

References

Ädel, Annelie and Anna Mauranen. 2010. “Metadiscourse: Diverse and Divided Perspective.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 1-11.

Bernad-Mechó, Edgar. 2017. “Metadiscourse and Topic Introductions in an Academic Lecture: A Multimodal Insight.” Multimodal Communication 6 (1): 39-60.

Bondi, Marina, Silvia Cacchiani and Davide Mazzi, eds. 2015. Discourse in and through the Media: Recontextualizing and Reconceptualizing Expert Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Bou-Franch, Patricia and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, eds. 2019. Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa. 2021. “Multimodal Metadiscourse in Digital Academic Journals on Linguistics, Engineering and Medicine.” European Journal of English Studies 25 (3): 259-79.

Collins, Kimberley, David Shiffman and Jenny Rock. 2016. “How are Scientists using Social Media in the Workplace?” PloS ONE 11 (10): e0162680.

D’Angelo, Larissa. 2016. Academic Posters: A Textual and Visual Metadiscourse Analysis. Bern: Peter Lang.

De Groot, Elizabeth et al. 2016. “Picture this: Developing a Model for the Analysis of Visual Metadiscourse.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 30 (2): 165-201.

Engberg, Jan and Carmen Daniela Maier. 2020. “Getting Ready for the Next Steps: Multimodal and Hypermodal Knowledge Communication in Academic Context.” In Maci et al. 2020, 225-41.

European Commission. 2012. “Communicating EU Research and Innovation Guidance for Project Participants.” [Accessed online on December 13, 2021].

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra and Tereza Spilioti, eds. 2016. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication. London and New York: Routledge.

Gertrudix, Manuel et al. 2020. “Gestión de la comunicación científica de los proyectos de investigación en H2020. Funciones, modelos y estrategias.” Profesional de la Información 29 (4): e290424.

— et al. 2021. “Comunicación científica en el espacio digital. Acciones de difusión de proyectos de investigación del programa H2020.” Profesional de la Información 30 (1): e300104.

Given, Lisa M., ed. 2008. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Vol 1. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Gruber, Helmut. 2017. “Quoting and Retweeting as Communicative Practices in Computer Mediated Discourse.” Discourse, Context & Media 20: 1-9.

Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.

—. 2017. “Metadiscourse: What is it and Where is it Going?” Journal of Pragmatics 113: 16-29.

— and Philip Shaw, eds. 2016. The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes. London and New York: Routledge.

— and Polly Tse. 2004. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.” Applied Linguistics 25: 156-77.

Kuteeva, Maria. 2016. “Research Blogs, Wikis and Tweets.” In Hyland and Shaw 2016, 431-44.

Lomborg, Stine. 2011. “Social Media as Communicative Genres.” MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 27 (51): 55-73.

Lorés, Rosa. 2020. “Science on the Web: The Exploration of European Research Websites of Energy-related Projects as Digital Genres for the Promotion of Values.” Discourse, Context & Media 35: 100389.

Lorés-Sanz, Rosa and Isabel Herrando-Rodrigo. 2020. “New Concepts, Different Approaches: Tackling E-visibility in Research Project Websites.” Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 15: 83-98.

Maci, Stefania, Michele Sala and Cinzia Spinci, eds. 2020. Communicating English in Specialised Domains: A Festschrift for Maurizio Gotti. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Mahrt, Merja, Katrin Weller and Isabella Peters. 2014. “Twitter in Scholarly Communication.” In Weller et al. 2014, 399-410.

Marwick, Alice and Dannah Boyd. 2010. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114-33.

Mur-Dueñas, Pilar. 2011. “An Intercultural Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Research Articles Written in English and in Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3068-79.

— and Rosa Lorés, eds. 2022. Scientific and Parascientific Communication. Basel: MDPI.

Papacharissi, Zizi, ed. 2011. A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. London and New York: Routledge.

Pascual, Daniel. 2023. “Scientific Dissemination and Professional Practices through Digital Media: The Study of Pragmatic Strategies in the Communication of International Research Projects.” PhD diss., University of Zaragoza.

— and Pilar Mur-Dueñas. 2022. “Dialogic Interaction with Diversified Audiences in Twitter for Research Dissemination Purposes.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90: 61-79.

—, Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Rosa Lorés. 2020. “Looking into International Research Groups’ Digital Discursive Practices.” Research in Corpus Linguistics 8 (2): 87-102.

Petroni, Sandra. 2019. “How Social Media Shape Identities and Discourses in Professional Digital Settings: Self-communication or Self-branding?” In Bou-Franch and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich 2019, 251-82. Plo, Ramón and Isabel Corona, eds. 2023. Digital Scientific Communication: Identity and Visibility in Research Dissemination. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pontrandolfo, Gianluca and Sara Piccioni, eds. 2021. Comunicación especializada y divulgación en la red. Aproximaciones basadas en corpus. London and New York: Routledge.

Puschmann, Cornelius. 2015. “A Digital Mob in the Ivory Tower? Context Collapse in Scholarly Communication Online.” In Bondi et al. 2015, 22-45.

Seargeant, Philip and Caroline Tagg. 2014a. “Introduction: The Language of Social Media.” In Seargeant and Tagg 2014b, 1-20.

— and Caroline Tagg, eds. 2014b. The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Squires, Lauren. 2016. “Twitter: Design, Discourse and the Implications of Public Text.” In Georgakopoulou and Spilioti 2016, 239-55.

Van den Hoonaard, Will C. 2008. “Inter- and Intracoder Reliability.” In Given 2008, 445-46.

Veletsianos, George. 2016. Networked Scholars: Social Media in Academia. London and New York: Routledge.

Weller, Katrin et al., eds. 2014. Twitter and Society. Bern: Peter Lang.

Yang, Wenhsien. 2016. “Evaluative Language and Interactive Discourse in Journal Article Highlights.” English for Specific Purposes 42: 89-103.

Published
2023-12-27
Section
Articles

Funding data