Unmarried Mothers on the English Stage after the Godly Revolution
Abstract
Unmarried mothers and children born out of wedlock are notoriously absent from the Carolean stage, which, on the other hand, saw an abundance of rakish gallants and prostitutes populating sexually charged plots. It is not a coincidence that the only two plays premiered between the 1660s and 1700 featuring an unmarried woman with a live child come up precisely with the arrival of William and Mary. This paper analyses the ways in which these plays—The Squire of Alsatia (1688) by Thomas Shadwell, and The Marriage-Hater Matched (1692) by Thomas Durfey—use the unmarried mother to convey a moral message that echoed William and Mary’s project of moral reform. However, these women are portrayed in radically different ways in both comedies. Although she takes a customary position of scorn in The Squire, the unmarried mother gets to be a good-hearted heroine that is eventually redeemed in The Marriage-Hater, a very challenging position for Durfey to portray which required of intra and extra textual devices to support her redemption without appearing to condone vice.References
Bahlman, Dudley W. R. 1957. The Moral Revolution of 1688. New Haven: Yale UP. Behn, Aphra. 1677. The Debauchee, or, The Credulous Cuckold. London: Printed for John Amery.
Capern, Amanda. 2010. The Historical Study of Women: England 1500-1700. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Claydon, Tony. 1996. William III and the Godly Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. Dabhoiwala, Faramerz. 2007. “Sex and Societies of Moral Reform, 1688-1800.” Journal of British Studies 46: 290-319.
Davenant, William. 1673. The Law against Lovers: The Works of Sir William Davenant. London: Printed by T.N. for Henry Herringman.
Durfey, Thomas. 1677. A Fond Husband, or, The Plotting Sisters. London: Printed by T.N. for James Magnes and Richard Bentley.
—. (1688) 2014. The Marriage-Hater Matched. Edited by Manuel J. Gómez Lara, María José Mora Sena and Paula de Pando Mena. Barcelona: Edición de la Universitat de Barcelona.
Gill, Catie, ed. 2010. Theatre and Culture in Early Modern England, 1650-1737: From Leviathan to Licensing Act. Burlington: Ashgate.
Gowing, Laura. 2012. Gender Relations in Early Modern England. Harlow: Pearson.
Jeffares, A. Norman, ed. 1974. Restoration Comedy. Vol. 3. London: Folio Press. Lacy, John. 1672. The Old Troop, or, Monsieur Raggou. London: Printed for William Crook and Thomas Dring.
Leanerd, John. 1677. The Country Innocence, or, the Chamber-maid Turn’d Quaker. London: Printed for Charles Harper.
Mendelson, Sara and Patricia Crawford. 1998. Women in Early Modern England, 1550-1720. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mora, María José, coord. 2019. Restoration Comedy,1671–1682: a Catalogue. Youngstown: Teneo Press.
— and Manuel J. Gómez Lara. 2010. “Revolution and the Moral Reform of the Stage: The Case of Durfey’s The Marriage-Hater Matched (1692).” In Gill 2010, 145-56.
Picard, Liza. 2014. Restoration London: Everyday Life in London 1660-1670. London: Phoenix.
Potter, Lois. 2003. “Politics and Popular Culture: the Theatrical Response to the Revolution.” In Schwoerer 2003, 184 97.
Ravenscroft, Edward. 1673. The Careless Lovers. London: Printed for William Cademan.
Ross, John C. 1996. “Theatricality and Revolution Politics in “The Squire of Alsatia” and “Bury-Fair.” Restoration: Studies in English Literary Culture, 1660-1700 20 (2): 217-35.
Schwoerer, Lois G. 2003. The Revolution of 1688-1689. Changing Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Shadwell, Thomas. (1688) 1974. “The Squire of Alsatia.” In Jeffares 1974, 105-223. Stone, Lawrence. 1995. Road to Divorce. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Wycherley, William. 1672. Love in a Wood, or, St. James’s Park. London: Printed by J.M. for H. Herringman.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.