Abandoning the Quest? High/Epic Fantasy and the Challenges of the Anthropocene
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2024-46.1.08Abstract
The aim of this article is to determine why the prototypical form of high/epic fantasy cannot effectively address the present environmental, social and political problems gathered under the umbrella term of the Anthropocene. Drawing on Marek Oziewicz’s concept of planetarianist fantasy and scholarship on the Anthropocene, as well as on examples of selected fantasy series (J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, Stephen R. Donaldson’s The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, Guy Gavriel Kay’s The Fionavar Tapestry, and Robert Jordan’s The Wheel of Time), this article investigates the sub-genre’s most persistent components and juxtaposes them against issues related to ethnicity, species interconnectedness, non-human agency, sustained urban development and urban ethics which are raised by Anthropocene debates. This analysis will illustrate why the form of high/epic fantasy requires reconfiguration so that it can continue to evolve together with the needs of contemporary readers.
Downloads
References
Ansloos, Jeffrey. 2016. “Peace like a Red River: Indigenous Human Rights for Decolonising Reconciliation.” In Devere, Te Maihāroa and Synott 2016, 65-76.
Attebery, Brian. 1980. The Fantasy Tradition in American Literature: From Irving to Le Guin. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
—. 1992. Strategies of Fantasy. Bloomington: Indiana UP.
Brawley, Chris. 2014. Nature and the Numinous in Mythopoeic Fantasy Literature. Jefferson: McFarland.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35: 197-222.
Chan, Jeffrey K.H. 2019. Urban Ethics in the Anthropocene: The Moral Dimensions of Six Emerging Conditions in Contemporary Urbanism. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
Clute, John and John Grant, eds. 1997. The Encyclopedia of Fantasy. London: Orbit.
Colligs, Britta Maria. 2021. “The Forest as a Voice for Nature: Ecocriticism in Fantasy Literature.” In Dědinová, Łaszkiewicz and Borowska-Szerszun 2021, 67-86.
Comos, Gina and Caroline Rosenthal. 2019. “Introduction.” In Comos and Rosenthal 2019, viii-xxii.
—, eds. 2019. Anglophone Literature and Culture in the Anthropocene. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Coulthard, Glen Sean. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P.
Crutzen, Paul and Eugene F. Stoermer. 2000. “The ‘Anthropocene’.” Global Change 41: 17-18.
Davis, Heather and Zoe Todd. 2017. “On the Importance of a Date, or Decolonizing the Anthropocene.” ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 16 (4): 761-80.
Dědinová, Tereza, Weronika Łaszkiewicz and Sylwia Borowska-Szerszun, eds. 2021. Images of the Anthropocene in Speculative Fiction: Narrating the Future. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Devere, Heather, Kelli Te Maihāroa and John P. Synott, eds. 2016. Peacebuilding and the Rights of Indigenous People: Experiences and Strategies for the 21st Century. New York: Springer.
Drout, Michael D.C., ed. 2007. J.R.R. Tolkien Encyclopedia: Scholarship and Critical Assessment. New York: Routledge.
Eco, Umberto. 1986. “Dreaming of the Middle Ages.” In Eco 1986, 61-72.
—. 1986. Travels in Hyperreality: Essays. Trans. William Weaver. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Eliade, Mircea. 1996. Patterns in Comparative Religion. Translated by Rosemary Sheed, Lincoln and London: U of Nebraska P.
Grossman, Lev. 2012. “Why Our Culture Looks to Fantasy Novels.” The Lavin Agency Speakers Bureau, March 7. [Accessed March 20, 2024].
Hetzner, Christiaan. 2022. “Jeff Bezos’ New Lord of the Rings Show Is Angering Fans because it Has Black Dwarves. Seriously.” Fortune, February 19. [Accessed March 20, 2024].
Honegger, Thomas. 2010. “(Heroic) Fantasy and the Middle Ages – Strange Bedfellows or an Ideal Cast?” Itinéraires 3: n/p. [Accessed March 20, 2024].
Hunt, Peter, ed. 1996. International Companion Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature. London: Routledge.
James, Edward and Farah Mendlesohn, eds. 2012. The Cambridge Companion to Fantasy Literature. Cambridge: CUP.
Ketterer, David, ed. 2004. Flashes of the Fantastic: Selected Essays from The War of the Worlds Centennial, Nineteenth International Conference on the Fantastic in the Arts. Westport: Praeger.
Łaszkiewicz, Weronika. 2018. Fantasy Literature and Christianity: A Study of the Mistborn, Coldfire, Fionavar Tapestry and Chronicles of Thomas Covenant Series. Jefferson: McFarland.
Mathews, Richard. 2002. Fantasy: The Liberation of Imagination. New York: Routledge. Meijer, Eva. 2016. “Speaking with Animals: Philosophical Interspecies Investigations.” In Tønnessen, Armstrong Oma and Rattasepp 2016, 73-88.
Moorcock, Michael. 1987. Wizardry and Wild Romance: A Study of Epic Fantasy. London: Gollancz.
Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
Oziewicz, Marek. 2022. “Fantasy for the Anthropocene: On the Ecocidal Unconscious, Planetarianism, and Imagination of Biocentric Futures.” In Oziewicz, Attebery and Dědinová 2022, 58-69.
—, Brian Attebery and Tere, eds. 2022. Fantasy and Myth in the Anthropocene: Imagining Futures and Dreaming Hope in Literature and Media. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Palmer-Patel, C. 2020. The Shape of Fantasy: Investigating the Structures of American Heroic Epic Fantasy. New York: Routledge.
Pincetl, Stephanie. 2017. “Cities in the Age of the Anthropocene: Climate Change Agents and the Potential for Mitigation.” Anthropocene 20: 74-82.
Rabkin, Eric S., ed. 1979. Fantastic Worlds: Myths, Tales, and Stories. Oxford: OUP. Rogers, Brett M. and Benjamin Eldon Stevens, eds. 2017. Classical Traditions in Modern Fantasy. Oxford: OUP.
Selling, Kim. 2004. “‘Fantastic Neomedievalism’: The Image of the Middle Ages in Popular Fantasy.” In Ketterer 2004, 211-18.
Senior, W.A. 2012. “Quest fantasies.” In James and Mendlesohn 2012, 190-99. Sullivan III, C.W. 1996. “High Fantasy.” In Hunt 1996, 300-10.
Slethaug, Gordon E. 1993. “‘The Discourse of Arrogance’, Popular Power, and Anarchy: The (First) Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever.” Extrapolation 34 (1): 48-63.
Stableford, Brian. 2005. Historical Dictionary of Fantasy Literature. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.
Todd, Billy. 2019. “From the Two Rivers: Casting and Race in The Wheel of Time.” Tor, August 20. [Accessed March 20, 2024].
Tolkien, J.R.R. 1988. Tree and Leaf. London: Unwin Hyman.
Tønnessen, Morten, Kristin Armstrong Oma and Silver Rattasepp, eds. 2016. Thinking about Animals in the Age of the Anthropocene. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Tuttle, Lisa. 2005. Writing Fantasy and Science Fiction. London: A & C Black.
Weiner, Jesse. 2017. “Classical Epic and the Poetics of Modern Fantasy.” In Rogers and Stevens 2017, 25-46.
Williamson, Jamie. 2015. The Evolution of Modern Fantasy: From Antiquarianism to the Ballantine Adult Fantasy Series. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wise, Denis Wilson. 2020. “On Ways of Studying Tolkien: Notes Toward a Better (Epic) Fantasy Criticism.” Journal of Tolkien Research 9 (11): 1-25.
Young, Helen. 2016. Race and Popular Fantasy: Habits of Whiteness. New York: Routledge.
Zapf, Hubert. 2019. “The Challenge of the Anthropocene and the Sustainability of Texts.” In Comos and Rosenthal 2019, 2-22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
