English Transported to Australia: Factors Affecting the Choice of Relativisation Strategies in Diaries Written from 1788 to 1900
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2024-46.2.02Abstract
This paper explores the distribution of different relativisation strategies, namely, the wh-relatives, that and zero, in diaries written in Australia in the last decades of the eighteenth century and throughout the nineteenth century. Several factors have been considered in order to determine the reasons behind the choice of these strategies: gender, period, status, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent. According to the results, wh-relatives were more likely to be used in the first half of the nineteenth century. In addition, the authors with low or average education tended to favour the use of non-case marked relatives to the detriment of wh-relatives. By contrast, gender was determined not to have played a role in the selection of relativisers. Furthermore, syntactic position and animacy of the antecedent also influenced the relative markers that could be present in a specific syntactic slot.
Downloads
References
Aarts, Bas, María José López-Couso and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2012. “Late Modern English Syntax.” In Bergs and Brinton 2012, 869-87.
Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc (version 3.4.3). Computer Software. Tokyo: Waseda University.
Austin, Frances O. 1985. “Relative Which in Late 18th-century Usage: the Clift Family Correspondence.” In Eaton et al. 1985, 15-29.
Australian National Corpus Incorporated. 2010. Australian National Corpus. University of Melbourne.
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2020. “Changes Affecting Relative Clauses in Late Modern English.” In Kytö and Smitterberg 2020, 91-115.
Ball, Catherine. 1996. “A Diachronic Study of Relative Markers in Spoken and Written English.” Language Variation and Change 8: 227-58.
Beal, Joan. 2004. English in Modern Times. London: Arnold.
Bergs, Alexander and Laurel J. Brinton, eds. 2012. English Historical Linguistics. An International Handbook. Vol 1. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Biber, Douglas and Edward Finegan, comp. 1990-2013. A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers (ARCHER Corpus). University of Manchester.
Borrie, Wilfred D. 1994. The European Peopling of Australasia: A Demographic History, 1788-1988. Canberra: Demography Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.
Burchfield, Robert, ed. 1994. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol 5, English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Clemens, Fitz, comp. 1995-2002. Corpus of Oz Early English. Free University of Berlin.
Cochrane, George R. 1989. “Origins and Development of the Australian Accent.” In Collins and Blair 1989, 176-86.
Collins, Peter. 2014. “Relative Clauses in Australian English: A Cross-Varietal Diachronic Study.” In Gawne 2014, 355-71.
— and David Blair, eds. 1989. Australian English. St. Lucia: U. of Queensland P.
Culpeper, Jonathan and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Damousi, Joy. 2010. Colonial Voices: A Cultural History of English in Australia 1840-1940. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1984. “Relativicers [sic] in Early Modern English: A Dynamic Quantitative Study.” In Fisiak 1984, 61-87.
Denison, David. 1998. “Syntax.” In Romaine 1998, 92-329.
Dossena, Marina. 2007. “As this leaves me at present: Formulaic Usage, Politeness and Social Proximity in Nineteenth-Century Scottish Emigrants’ letters.” In Elspass et al. 2007, 13-29.
Eaton, Roger, ed. 1985. Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Elspass, Stephan. 2012. “The Use of Private Letters and Diaries in Sociolinguistic Investigation.” In Hernández-Campoy 2012, 156-69.
— et al., eds. 2007. Germanic Language Histories ‘From Below’ (1700-2000). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fisiak, Jacek, ed. 1984. Historical Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fritz, Clemens. 2004. “From Plato to Aristotle-Investigating Early Australian English.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 24 (1): 57-97.
Gawne, Lauren, ed. 2014. Selected Papers from the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Görlach, Manfred. 2001. Eighteenth-Century English. Heidelberg: C. Winter. Hammarström, Göran. 1980. Australian English: Its Origins and Status. Hamburg: Buske.
Hassam, Andrew. 1994. Sailing to Australia: Shipboard Diaries by Nineteenth-Century British Emigrants. Melbourne: Melbourne UP.
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel and Juan Camilo Conde Silvestre, eds. 2012. The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hickey, Raymond. 2019. Keeping in Touch: Emigrant Letters across the English-Speaking World, Vol. 10. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
—. 2020. “The Interplay of Internal and External Factors in Varieties of English.” In Kytö and Smitterberg 2020, 43-64.
Huber, Magnus. 2017. “Structural and Sociolinguistic Factors Conditioning the Choice of Relativizers in Late Modern English: A Diachronic Study Based on the Old Bailey Corpus.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 16 (1): 74-119.
—, Magnus Nissel and Karin Puga, comp. 2016. Old Bailey Corpus, v.2. Open University, University of Hertfordshire and University of Sheffield.
Johansson, Christine. 2006. “Relativisers in 19th-Century English.” In Kytö, Rydén and Smitterber 2006, 136-82.
—. 2012. “Relativisation in Early Modern English Written Versus Speech-Related Genres.” In Bergs and Brinton 2012, 776-90.
King James Bible. 1611-1769. King James Bible, online version. [Accessed April 20, 2023].
Korte, Barbara. 2000. English Travel Writing from Pilgrimages to Postcolonial Explorations. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kytö, Merja, Mats Rydén and Erik Smitterberg, eds. 2006. Nineteenth-Century English: Stability and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
— and Erik Smitterberg, eds. 2020. Late Modern English: Novel Encounters. Vol 214. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lass, Roger, ed. 1999. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol III, 1476-1776. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Lowth, Robert. 1763. A Short Introduction to English Grammar: With Critical Notes. 2nd ed. London: A. Millar.
Meredith, Louisa A. 1973. Notes and Sketches of New South Wales. Melbourne: Penguin.
Moore, Bruce. 2004. “The Dialect Evidence.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 24 (1): 21-40.
Mugglestone, Lynda. 1995. Talking Proper: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Murray, Lindley. 1798. English Grammar Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners: With an Appendix Containing Rules and Observations for Assisting the More Advanced Students to Write with Perspicuity and Accuracy. 4th ed. New York: Collins and Perkins.
Priestley, Joseph. 1772. The Rudiments of English Grammar: Adapted to the Use of Schools; with Notes and Observations. For the Use of Those Who Have Made Some Proficiency in the Language. London: John and Francis Rivington.
Rissanen, Matti. 1984. “The Choice of Relative Pronouns in 17th Century American English.” In Fisiak 1984, 417-35.
—. 1999. “Syntax.” In Lass 1999, 187-331.
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-Historical Linguistics. Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
—, ed. 1998. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol IV, 1776-1997. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Sheridan, Thomas. 1756. British Education. London and New York: Routledge.
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-Dialect Formation. The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
Turner, George W. 1994. “English in Australia.” In Burchfield 1994, 277-327.
Twain, Mark. 1973. Mark Twain in Australia and New Zealand. Melbourne: Penguin. Twopeny, Richard. 1973. Town Life in Australia. Melbourne: Penguin.
Visser, Frederikus Theodorus. 1963-1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2012. “Grammar Writing and Provincial Grammar Printing in the Eighteenth-Century British Isles.” Transactions of the Philological Society 110: 34-46.
—. 2015a. “‘Have you Ever Written a Diary or a Journal?’ Diurnal Prose and Register Variation.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 116 (2): 449-74.
—. 2015b. Grammar, Rhetoric and Usage in English. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
