Filming Metatheatre in Gregory Doran’s Macbeth: Refracting Theatrical Crises at the Turn of the Century
AbstractThis article contends that Gregory Doran’s production of Macbeth (2001) was, when translated to television, transformed into a metaplay. Although various previous analyses of Shakespeare’s Macbeth have explored its metatheatricality, this artistic concept has not been tackled with respect to this production in particular. In this work I am examining Doran’s laying bare of the film’s theatrical apparatus as well as its refractions of the crises occurring at the Royal Shakespeare Company while the film and the stage production were in process. I will address the status of the main characters as players in a theatricalized microcosm, explore the film’s backstage-onstage dynamics and discuss how the production’s visual meanings illuminate the company’s institutional crisis at the turn of the century.Keywords: Gregory Doran; Macbeth; Royal Shakespeare Company; metatheatre; backstage-onstage; ensemble
Abel, Lionel. 2003. Tragedy and Metatheatre. Essays on Dramatic Form. New York and London: Holmes and Meier.
Adler, Steven. 2001. Rough Magic: Making Theatre at the Royal Shakespeare Company. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois UP.
BBC. 2001. “All Change at the RSC.” BBC News, May 30. [Accessed online on February 17, 2018].
—. 2001. “RSC Redundancy Dispute Resolved.” BBC News, September 18. [Accessed online on February 17, 2018].
Beauman, Sally. 1982. The Royal Shakespeare Company. A History of Ten Decades. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP.
Billington, Michael. 2001. “Anyone Know a Good Builder?” The Guardian, May 9. [Accessed online on February 17, 2018].
Brantley, Ben. 2000. “THEATER REVIEW; Fierce Kindred Spirits, Burning for a Throne.” The New York Times, June 22. [Accessed online on March 17, 2016].
Brooks, Cleanth. (1947) 1960. The Well-Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. London: Dobson.
Bulman, James. 1996. “Introduction: Shakespeare and Performance Theory.” In Shakespeare, Theory and Performance, edited by James Bulman, 1-11. London and New York: Routledge.
Burnett, Mark T. 2007. Filming Shakespeare in the Global Marketplace. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Calderwood, James L. 1986. “If It Were Done”: Macbeth and Tragic Action. Amherst, MA: The U of Massachussets P.
Casson, Philip, dir. 1979. A Performance of Macbeth. London: Royal Shakespeare Company and Thames Television.
Cavendish, Dominic. 2002. “Lords, What Fools These Mortals Be!” The Telegraph, March 30. [Accessed online on January 14, 2018].
Chambers, Colin. (2004) 2005. Inside the Royal Shakespeare Company: Creativity and the Institution. London and New York: Routledge.
Coursen, H. R. 2002. Shakespeare in Space: Recent Shakespeare Productions on Screen. Bern: Peter Lang.
Davies, Anthony. (1988) 1991. Filming Shakespeare’s Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Dollimore, Jonathan. (1985) 2003. “Introduction: Shakespeare, Cultural Materialism and the New Historicism.” In Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd ed., edited by Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, 2-17. Manchester: Manchester UP.
Doran, Gregory, dir. 2001. Macbeth. London: Illuminations Media, BBC and Royal Shakespeare Company.
—. 2002. “1594 and All That.” The Guardian, April 16. [Accessed online on December 17, 2017].
—. 2006. “As Performed by the Royal Shakespeare Company at the Swan Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1999.” In Macbeth. Bringing the Shakespeare Page to Life. The Sourcebooks Shakespeare, edited by William Proctor Williams, 11-19. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks Media Fusion.
Egginton, William. 2003. How the World Became a Stage: Presence, Theatricality, and the Question of Modernity. Albany: State U of New York P.
Filmer, Andrew. 2006. “Backstage Space: The Place of the Performer.” PhD diss., University of Sydney.
Fox, Michael David. 2013. “Like a Poor Player: Audience Emotional Response, Nonrepresentational Performance, and the Staging of Suffering in Macbeth.” In Macbeth: New Critical Essays, edited by Nick Moschovakis, 208-223. New York and London: Routledge.
Freese Witt, Mary Ann. 2014. Metatheater and Modernity: Baroque and Neobaroque. Madison and Teaneck, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson UP.
Gilbert, Miriam. 2002. “Exchange: The Leasing-Out of the RSC.” Shakespeare Quarterly 54 (4): 512-524.
Greenhalgh, Susan. 2003. “‘Alas Poor Country!’: Documenting the Politics of Performance in Two British Television Macbeths since the 1980s.” In Remaking Shakespeare: Performance Across Media, Genres and Cultures, edited by Pascale Aebischer, Edward J. Esche and Nigel Wheale, 93-114. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guardian, The. 2001. “The Observer: Royal Shakespeare Company. Defiant RSC Director Attacks ‘Snobbery’ and ‘Insulting’ Critics,” November 25. [Accessed online on February 25, 2018].
Hatchuel, Sarah. 2008. Shakespeare, From Stage to Screen. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Hewison, Robert, John Holden and Samuel Jones. 2010. All Together: A Creative Approach to Organisational Change. London: Demos.
Hindle, Maurice. (2007) 2015. Shakespeare on Film. 2nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Huertas Martín, Víctor. 2017. “An Interview with John Wyver.” Unpublished manuscript, last modified 25 December 2017.
Huyssen, Andreas. 2000. “Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia.” Public Culture 12 (1): 21-38.
IMDb. 1990-2018. “Macbeth (2001).” Internet Movie Database. [Accessed online on March 13, 2018].
Ingham, Michael. 2017. Stageplay and Screenplay: The Intermediality of Theatre and Cinema. London and New York: Routledge.
Jury, Louise. 2003. “Financial Drama at RSC Eased as Debts are Reduced by Half.” The Independent, September 13. [Accessed online July 17, 2017].
Lanier, Douglas. (2002) 2012. Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Mason, Pamela. 2013. “Sunshine in Macbeth.” In Macbeth: New Critical Essays, edited by Nick Moschovakis, 335-349. New York and London: Routledge.
McCullough, Christopher J. 1988. “The Cambridge Connection Toward a Materialist Theatre Sacrifice.” In The Shakespeare Myth, edited by Graham Holderness, 112-121. Manchester: Manchester UP.
Morrison, James. 2002. “RSC Chief Is Wrong, Say Theatre Knights.” The Independent, March 22. [Accessed online on January 21, 2018].
O’Neill, Stephen. 2018. “Introduction.” In Broadcast Your Shakespeare: Continuity and Change Across Media, edited by Stephen O’Neill, 1-23. London: Bloomsbury.
Pardo García, Pedro Javier. 2017. “La reflexividad teatral del escenario a la pantalla.” Tropelías. Revista de Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada (2): 409-436.
Roundhouse Trust. n.d. “History of the Roundhouse.” Roundhouse. [Accessed online on September 28, 2018].
Shakespeare, William (1623) 2008. Macbeth (The New Cambridge Shakespeare). Edited by A.R. Braunmuller. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge UP.
Sheppard, Philippa. 2017. Devouring Time: Nostalgia in Contemporary Shakespearean Screen Adaptations. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP.
Sher, Antony. (2001) 2009. Beside Myself: An Actor’s Life. London: Nick Hern.
Sinfield, Alan. (1985) 2003. “Royal Shakespeare: Theatre and the Making of Ideology.” In Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. 2nd ed., edited by Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield, 182-205. Manchester: Manchester UP.
Sinyard, Neil. 2000. “Shakespeare Meets The Godfather: The Postmodern Populism of Al Pacino’s Looking for Richard.” In Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, edited by Mark T. Burnett and Ramona Wray, 58-72. New York: Macmillan.
Spencer, Charles. 2002. “How I Feel the RSC Has Been Betrayed.” The Guardian, April 18. [Accessed online July 15, 2017].
Spurgeon, Caroline F. E. (1935) 2005. Shakespeare’s Imagery and What It Tells Us. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Stam, Robert. 1992. Reflexivity in Film and Literature: From Don Quixote to Jean-Luc Godard. New York: Columbia UP.
Trowbridge, Simon. 2013. The Rise and Fall of the Royal Shakespeare Company. Oxford: Albert Creed.
Walter, Harriet. 2002. Actors on Shakespeare. Macbeth. London: Faber and Faber.
Wells, James. 2013. “‘To Be Thus is Nothing.’ Macbeth and the Trials of Dramatic Identity.” In Macbeth: New Critical Essays, edited by Nick Moschovakis, 224-239. London and New York: Routledge.
Wilson, Richard. 2013. Free Will: Art and Power on Shakespeare’s Stage. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP.
Wray, Ramona and Mark T. Burnett. 2000. “Introduction.” In Shakespeare, Film, Fin de Siècle, edited by Mark T. Burnett and Ramona Wray, 1-9. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan and Saint Martin’s Press.
—. 2005. “Histories.” In Reconceiving the Renaissance: A Critical Reader, edited by Ewan Fernie, Ramona Wray and Mark T. Burnett, 85-144. Oxford: Oxford UP.
—. 2006. “Introduction.” In Screening Shakespeare in the Twenty-First Century, edited by Mark T. Burnett and Ramona Wray, 1-12. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
Wyver, John. (2007) 2015. “Appendix: Filming Shakespeare for the Small Screen—An Interview with John Wyver, Illuminations Filmmaker and Producer.” In Shakespeare on Film, edited by Maurice Hindle, 281-290. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.