Taking the I out of Being: Zen Buddhism and Postmodern (Dis)contents in Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being
AbstractBy internalizing Zen Buddhist teachings, the protagonists of Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being (2013) resolve their conflicts with the world and within themselves. The scenario echoes current theoretical interest in the Buddhist concept of no-self as a model of self that is suited to the postmodern condition. This article argues that since the fundamental Buddhist principles conceptually accommodate the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics—the key to the novel’s structure—and the metaphysical framework of postmodernity, Ozeki’s novel illuminates the empowering aspects of the fractal nature of postmodern selves, while charting the possibilities for their actualization.Keywords: Buddhism; digital cultures; empowerment; fractal subject; postmodernity
Baudrillard, Jean. 2004. “Simulacra and Simulations.” In Rivkin and Ryan 2004, 365-77.
—. 2011. Impossible Exchange. Translated by Chris Turner. London: Verso.
Beauregard, Guy. 2015. “On Not Knowing: A Tale for the Time Being and the Politics of Imagining Lives After March 11.” Canadian Literature 227 (Winter): 96-112.
Bernard, Catherine. 2017. “And Yet: Figuring Global Trauma in Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being.” In Ganteau and Onega 2017, 22-34.
Dallmayr, Reinhard. 1996. Beyond Orientalism: Essays on Cross-Cultural Encounter. Albany: SUNY P.
Davis, Bret W. 2018. “Zen’s Nonegocentric Perspectivism.” In Emmanuel 2018, 123-44.
Davis, Rocío G. 2015. “Fictional Transits in Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being.” Biography 38 (1): 87-104.
Deutsch, David. 2011. The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations that Transform the World. London: Allen Lane.
Dōgen, Eihei. 2002. The Heart of Dōgen’s Shōbōgenzō. Translated by Norman Waddell and Masao Abe. Albany: SUNY P.
Emmanuel, Steven M., ed. 2018. Buddhist Philosophy: A Comparative Approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Ganteau, Jean-Michel and Susana Onega, eds. 2017. Victimhood and Vulnerability in 21st Century Fiction. New York and London: Routledge.
Gaskins, Robert W. 1999. “‘Adding Legs to a Snake’: A Reanalysis of Motivation and the Pursuit of Happiness from a Zen Buddhist Perspective.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (2): 204-15.
Giles, James. 1993. “The No-Self Theory: Hume, Buddhism, and Personal Identity.” Philosophy East and West 43 (2): 175-200.
Ho, David Y. F. 1995. “Selfhood and Identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism: Contrasts with the West.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 25 (2): 115-39.
Hoffman, Louis et al. 2008. “Toward a Sustainable Myth of Self: An Existential Response to the Postmodern Condition.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology 49 (2): 135-73.
Kittler, Friedrich. 1987. “Gramophone, Film, Typewriter.” Translated by Dorothea von Mücke with the assistance of Philippe L. Similon. October 41 (Summer): 101-18.
Krevel, Mojca. 2017. “A Tale of Being Everything: Literary Subject in Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being.” Brno Studies in English 43 (2): 111-25.
Lee, Hsiu-chuan. 2018. “Sharing Worlds through Words: Minor Cosmopolitics in Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being.” Ariel: A Review of International English Literature 49 (1): 27-52.
Levine, Bruce E. 2013. “How our Society Breeds Anxiety, Depression and Dysfunction.” Salon, August 26. [Accessed online on June 14, 2017].
Lovell, Sue. 2018. “Towards a Poetics of Posthumanist Narrative Using Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale for the Time Being.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 59 (1): 57-74.
Ozeki, Ruth. 2013a. “Confessions of a Zen Novelist.” Buddhadharma: The Practitioner’s Quarterly 15: 34-39.
—. 2013b. A Tale for the Time Being. New York: Penguin.
—. 2013c. “‘A Universe of Many Worlds’: An Interview with Ruth Ozeki.” By Eleanor Ty. MELUS: Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States 38 (3): 160-71.
—. 2013d. “Ruth Ozeki: ‘This Book is about the Character Creating a Novelist.’” By Anita Sethi. Guardian, March 7. [Accessed online on March 15, 2016].
Raud, Rein. 2015. “Dōgen’s Idea of Buddha-Nature: Dynamism and Non-Referentiality.” Asian Philosophy 25 (1): 1-14.
Rifkin, Jeremy. 2009. The Emphatic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. New York: Tarcher/Penguin.
Rivkin, Julie and Michael Ryan, eds. 2004. Literary Theory: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stolorow, Robert D. 2009. “Identity and Resurrective Ideology in an Age of Trauma.” Psychoanalytic Psychology 26 (2): 206-209.
Usui, Masami. 2015. “The Waves of Words: Literature of 3/11 in and around Ruth Ozeki’s A Tale of [sic] the Time Being.” Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 208: 91-95.
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.