Another Look at Old English Zero Derivation and Alternations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28914/Atlantis-2019-41.1.09Abstract
This article offers an overview of zero derivation in Old English, a description of the vocalic alternations that hold between zero derived nouns, adjectives and weak verbs and their bases of derivation as well as an account of the significance of alternations in the wider context of the evolution of the lexicon of English. Alternations are quantified and related to i-mutation and word-formation processes by distinguishing direct from reverse alternations and alternations with a strong verb source from alternations with a weak verb target. The conclusions reflect the synchronic-diachronic character of alternations. On the synchronic axis, alternations represent a relatively generalised phenomenon that affects all classes of both strong and weak verbs, while, on the diachronic axis, they allow us to assess the progress of the change from variable to invariable base morphology.
Keywords: alternation; word-formation; zero derivation; morphology; Old English
Downloads
References
Bammesberger, Alfred. 1965. “Deverbative jan-Verba des Altenglischen, vergleichend mit den übrigen altgermanischen Sprachen dargestellt.” PhD diss., Ludwig-Maximilians Universität.
Bauer, Laurie and Salvador Varela, eds. 2005. Approaches to Conversion/Zero Derivation. Münster: Waxmann.
Bosworth, Joseph and Thomas N. Toller. 1973. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford UP.
Brinton, Laurel J. and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Cameron, Angus et al. 2018. Dictionary of Old English: A to I online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project.
Clark Hall, John R. and Herbert D. Meritt. 1996. A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Toronto: U. of Toronto P.
Ellis, Michael. 1993. “Old English Lexicography and the Problem of Headword Spelling.” ANQ: A Quarterly Journal of Short Articles, Notes and Reviews 6 (1): 3-11.
Fulk, Robert D. 2009. “Morphology and Diachrony in A Grammar of Old English and the Dictionary of Old English.” Florilegium 26: 15-35.
García García, Luisa. 2012. “Old English jan-Causatives: Between Grammar and Lexicon.” In Martín Arista et al. 2012, 15-28.
Hallander, Lars G. 1966. Old English Verbs in -sian: A Semantic and Derivational Study. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Typological Changes in the Lexicon. Analytic Tendencies in English Noun Formation. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Heidermanns, Frank. 1993. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen Primäradjektive. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hiltunen, Risto. 1983. The Decline of the Prefixes and the Beginnings of the English Phrasal Verb. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.
Hinderling, Robert. 1967. Studien zu den starken Verbalabstrakta des Germanischen. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hogg, Richard, ed. 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
Holthausen, Ferdinand. 1963. Altenglisches etymologysches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
Jensen, John. 1913. Die I. und II. Ablautsreihe in der ae. Wortbildung. Kiel: H. Fiencke.
Kastovsky, Dieter. 1968. Old English Deverbal Substantives Derived by Means of a Zero Morpheme. Tübingen: Eberhard-Karls-Universität.
—. 1992. “Semantics and Vocabulary.” In Hogg 1992, 290-408.
—. 2005. “Conversion and/or Zero: Word-Formation Theory, Historical Linguistics, and Typology.” In Bauer and Varela 2005, 31-50.
—. 2006. “Typological Changes in Derivational Morphology.” In Kemenade and Los, 151-77.
Kemenade, Ans van and Bettelou Los, eds. 2006. The Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mailhammer, Robert. 2007. The Germanic Strong Verb: Foundations and Development of a New System. Berlin: De Gruyter.
—. 2008. “Ablaut Variation in the Proto-Germanic Noun: The Long Arm of the Strong Verbs.” Sprachwissenschaft 33 (3): 279-300.
Martín Arista, Javier. 2011. “Adjective Formation and Lexical Layers in Old English.” English Studies 92 (3): 323-34.
—. 2012. “The Old English Prefix ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 32 (4): 411-33.
—. 2013. “Recursivity, Derivational Depth and the Search for Old English Lexical Primes.” Studia Neophilologica 85 (1): 1-21.
—. 2014. “Noun Layers in Old English. Asymmetry and Mismatches in Lexical Derivation.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 13 (3): 160-87.
Martín Arista, Javier et al., eds. 2012. Convergent Approaches to Mediaeval English Language and Literature. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Martín Arista, Javier, ed. et al. 2016. NerthusV3. Online Lexical Database of Old English. Nerthus Project. Universidad de La Rioja. [Accessed online on July 12, 2017].
Novo Urraca, Carmen and Laura Pesquera Fernández. 2015. “Alternation vs. Allomorphic Variation in Old English Word-Formation: Evidence from the Derivational Paradigm of Strong Verbs.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 49: 63-82.
Ogura, Michiko. 1995. “The Interchangeability of Old English Verbal Prefixes.” Anglo-Saxon England 24: 67-93.
Orel, Vladimir. 2003. A Handbook of Germanic Etymology. Leiden: Brill.
Palmgren, Carl. 1904. English Gradation-Nouns in their Relation to Strong Verbs. Uppsala: U. of Uppsala.
Pilch, Herbert. 1970. Altenglische Grammatik. München: Max Hueber Verlag.
Schön, Eduard. 1905. Die Bildung des Adjectivs im Altenglischen. Kiel: Verlag von Robert Cordes.
Schuldt, Claus. 1905. Die Bildung der schwachen Verba im Altenglischen. Kiel: Verlag von Robert Cordes.
Seebold, Elmar. 1970. Vergleichendes und etymologisches Wörterbuch der germanischen starken Verben. The Hague: Mouton.
Stark, Detlef. 1982. The Old English Weak Verbs. A Diachronic and Synchronic Analysis. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Sweet, Henry. 1987. The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. New York and London: Macmillan.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors retain copyright of articles. They authorise AEDEAN to publish them in its journal Atlantis and to include them in the indexing and abstracting services, academic databases and repositories the journal participates in.
Under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 4.0 International Licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), for non-commercial (i.e., personal or academic) purposes only, users are free to share (i.e., copy and redistribute in any medium or format) and adapt (i.e., remix, transform and build upon) articles published in Atlantis, free of charge and without obtaining prior permission from the publisher or the author(s), as long as they give appropriate credit to the author, the journal (Atlantis) and the publisher (AEDEAN), provide the relevant URL link to the original publication and indicate if changes were made. Such attribution may be done in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the journal endorses the user or their use of the material published therein. Users who adapt (i.e., remix, transform or build upon the material) must distribute their contributions under the same licence as the original.
Self-archiving is also permitted, so that authors are allowed to deposit the published PDF version of their articles in academic and/or institutional repositories, without fee or embargo. Authors may also post their individual articles on their personal websites, again on condition that the original link to the online edition is provided.
Authors are expected to know and heed basic ground rules that preclude simultaneous submission and/or duplicate publication. Prospective contributors to Atlantis commit themselves to the following when they submit a manuscript:
- That no concurrent consideration of the same, or almost identical, work by any other journal and/or publisher is taking place.
- That the potential contribution has not appeared previously, in any form whatsoever, in another journal, electronic format or as a chapter/section of a book.
Seeking permission for the use of copyright material is the responsibility of the author.
